
The work covered in the special issue is
international in scope, spanning seven countries. Separate articles present the
latest data on the instrument’s scientific reliability and validity, with a
special focus on the most critical question of how well the HCR-20 does what it
is supposed to do – predict risk. The authors represent quite a range, many of whom you will recognize.
The articles, which can be downloaded directly by
clicking on the below links, include the following:
- Introduction to the Special Issue of the HCR-20 Version 3 by Kevin S. Douglas
- Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): Development and Overview by Kevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, Henrik Belfrage, Laura S. Guy & Catherine M. Wilson
- The Use of the HCR-20V3 in Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Practice by Vivienne de Vogel, Ellen van den Broek and Michiel de Vries Robbé
- The HCR-20V3 in Germany by Sebastian Kötter, Fritjof von Franqué, Manfred Bolzmacher, Sabine Eucker, Barbara Holzinger & Rüdiger Müller-Isberner
- Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the HCR-20 Version 3 by Kevin S. Douglas & Henrik Belfrage
- Predicting Post-Discharge Community Violence in England and Wales Using the HCR-20V3 by Michael Doyle, Laura Archer Power, Jeremy Coid, Constantinos Kallis, Simone Ullrich & Jenny Shaw
- The Validity of Version 3 of the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme Amongst Offenders and Civil Psychiatric Patients by Diane S. Strub, Kevin S. Douglas & Tonia L. Nicholls
- Adapting the HCR-20V3 for Pre-trial Settings by Shannon Toney Smith, Shannon E. Kelley, Allison Rulseh, Karolina Sörman & John F. Edens
- The HCR-20 Version 3: A Case Study in Risk Formulation by Caroline Logan
Of related interest:
Long-awaited HCR-20 update to premiere in Scotland (Oct. 4, 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment