data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70313/703133dc1c422c76263a1fd7efe933948387d9a0" alt=""
The
University of Pennsylvania Law Review has a special issue on the changing landscape of U.S. criminal law, especially in the federal system. With plea bargains the norm, trials – which bring the possibility of acquittal – are becoming rarer. The articles are in response to an earlier essay by law professor
Ronald F. Wright entitled "
Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in Federal Criminal Justice."
This trend has direct relevance to the practice of forensic psychology. Without the truth-exploring forum of a trial, both trial lawyers and expert
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1af0/f1af0eef791b55db63993a27c015fbbc30ce5317" alt=""
witnesses could go the way of the
Siberian tiger. Our primary product becomes a written report that can aid the parties in their plea negotiations, by elucidating the nexus between an individual’s psychological dynamics or mental state and a specific legal issue (such as specific intent to commit a crime or risk to public safety).
The entire debate is available
online.
Hat tip to the Concurring Opinions blog for alerting me to this debate. Photo credits: Amber Rhea, sign on old Suntrust building in downtown Decatur, Illinois; Zoo Stream, Siberian tiger (Creative Commons license).