Monday, June 21, 2010

SVP laws bankrupting U.S. states

AP probe: $500 million-a-year hemorrhage

Today's MSNBC website has an excellent report by Martiga Lohn of the Associated Press on the hefty price tag of Sexually Violent Predator laws in the United States. Lawmakers are stymied because they don't want to appear "soft on crime," yet the mushrooming detention facilities are squeezing out social programs such as schools and health care.

The costs of incarceration alone are more than $500 million a year and rising, according to the analysis, and that does not include the "considerable legal expenses" of the actual commitment process. Last year, New York and California spent about $175,000 PER OFFENDER. In the 20 states with SVP laws, the average cost per offender was more than five times that of a regular prison bed, and more than double the cost of a year at an Ivy League university. For a fraction of these costs, imagine how many high-risk offenders could be enrolled in comprehensive "Circles of Support" to protect the public.

As Ms. Lohn reports, "these 'civil commitment' programs are costing states hundreds of millions of dollars more than anyone envisioned, and they've created a political quandary for lawmakers who need to cut spending but don't want to be seen as soft on rapists and child molesters."

Bang for the buck?

In many places, treatment costs are up sharply since 2005, raising doubts about whether the system is still worthwhile in an era of ruthless budget cuts brought on by the recession.

"I've heard people in a lot of the states quietly say, 'Oh, my God, I wish we'd never gotten this law,'" said W. Lawrence Fitch, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Law. "No one would ever dare offer repeal because it's just untenable." …

The heavy financial burden of treating confined sex offenders has left lawmakers with less money as they make agonizing cuts to areas like education and health care. Politicians who spent years cracking down on sex crimes now struggle to pay for their tougher laws.

"It's easy to say, 'Lock everybody up and throw away the key,'" said state Rep. Michael Paymar, a St. Paul Democrat who heads a public safety budget panel. "But it's just not practical." …

"They had no idea 10 years ago, seven years ago, what this program was going to cost," said Dennis Benson, a former prison warden who now oversees Minnesota's civilly committed sex offenders.

In most states, the number of confined sex offenders has steadily increased, requiring ever-greater spending….

Some states have steered clear of the civil-commitment system, partly because of financial reasons. In Louisiana, legislation died last year after top lawmakers questioned the cost and constitutional issues. Vermont legislators rejected a similar proposal....
The full story is HERE.

2 comments:

  1. Imagine, just imagine how all that money could be spent on prevention of crimes, instead of locking everyone up. In order to get out of civil committment it is my understanding that one has to be cleared by three psychiatrist. It is definetly time to revamp the whole sex offender registry. It isn't working. It does not protect our children. Maybe some of that money can be used to educate parents, and maybe there is another way??? Politicians have been so busy "appeasing citizens into a false security" that maybe they should come clean. The only reason most of the laws are in affect is to obtain a vote. The offender registry is only going to grow, unless the good citizens say "enough".

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJune 30, 2010

    If you want to know what is really happening with the pedophile panic, follow the money . . . which goes right to the psychiatrists and psychologists who are profiting from human suffering, the vast majority of which they are causing. (Apologies to the honest psychiatrists and psychologists. As with cops, the 98% that are corrupt are making the others look bad.)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

 
Real Time Web Analytics